вЂњTRANSITIONALвЂќ OR вЂњPATHOLOGICALвЂќ MODELS?
Both the right and gay/lesbian communities appear to own just two feasible types of bisexuality, neither of which represents bisexual people accurately. The very first is the вЂњtransitional modelвЂќ of bisexuality, thinking that every bisexuals are in reality gay or lesbian but are simply on the road to fundamentally coming out as gay. One other may be the вЂњpathological modelвЂќ, that bisexuals are neurotic or mentally unstable whether they are straight or gay/lesbian, and that they just canвЂ™t make a decision because they are in conflict trying to decide. Both models see bisexuality as a short-term experience or even a вЂњphaseвЂќ created out of confusion instead of a geniune orientation that is sexual. Some see bisexuality as inherently subversive since it blurs the boundaries, confronting both heterosexuals and homosexual males and lesbian females with intimate ambiguity. Because of this, bisexuality challenges principles of sex, conventional relationship and family members structures, monogamy, gender, and identification. Bisexuals cannot conform to either the homosexual or straight globe or they’d never be bisexual. Alternatively they must re invent personal ethics though they donвЂ™t fit anyone elseвЂ™s rules for themselves, and create responsible lifestyles and relationships that serve their needs even. Continue reading →